As a Radiologist I'm used to share during MDT ZFP for discussing patients' cases with other referring physicians. Sometimes is needed to go to visit a specific department to discuss some particular cases (to install UV in every client in the whole hospital).
It's needed the parity between UV and ZFP.
Here is a non-exhaustive list of features that I consider missing:
The mouse setting should be shared between UV and ZFP (other competitor like philips do it).
The customer miss image grouping functionality (splitting series based on b value or acquisition phases) available in UV and missed in ZFP.
Overlay configurations should be the same -> there is a FR on UV for improving that. The best idea is to have all TAG DICOM available in both products. (UV-I-368 and UV-I-247)
Triangulation feature (UVZ-I-121)