Description
Case number - 07212347 Having accurate information in the audit trails is extremely important! We frequently get deposed to legal cases and must justify every action in an audit trail.
Now we’re seeing that the audit trails between UV and WFM have conflicting information. Explaining other people’s audited actions in a court deposition surrounded by lawyers is intimidating enough, then to have conflicting audits on the same exam is going to be nearly impossible to explain
I’m sure there’s more questions that will arise but the biggest thing is we have sometimes where the audit doesn’t even show the radiologist opened it in UV….then we look in WFM and he/she had been in it for awhile!
To present both audits will open a major flaw in GE’s product…..not to mention the inability for us to clearly prove a timeline of when the study was reviewed and the treatment administered based on the radiology interpretation. |