All Centricity products use same verbiage across the board. Arrived/Unverified, QC'd/Verified, Signed/Complete. There should be one name for everything.

WFM and UV used the same statuses.

I was able to find only this “discrepancy” as WFM does not support the specific back-end/feature.

WFM can have as back-end CPACS or ETP, not a pure EA.

So this feature was never implemented.

the discrepancy is mainly when the exam is marked as Verified and the Mark as QC option is enabled.

If this is done in UV it is track in audit trail as “Marked as QC”

The feature is not available with WFM , so when the exam is Marked as Verified the same is showed in audit “Market as Verified”

I check in the user manual this is a specific feature.

Are you asking this feature to be available when WFM is used as a Worklist instead of UV Study List?

6.7.5 Mark Study as Verified (for Systems with EA Only)

Systems with EA-only integration do not have CPACS integration. Marking studies can

be enabled on EA-only systems when there is both a a local EA (EA Router) for routing

images, and an EA (CCA-EA) for receiving verified images for storage in a data center.

There are two workflows for marking studies as verified for systems configured for this

feature.

Can you please provide an example where we do not use same exam status description? I read the case but I didn't find more information.